Hello! I'm posting again! It's quite shocking, even to me! I have some links for you! And then I'm going to talk about Harry Potter for a bit! And now I'm going to stop with the exclamation marks.
The first link is to a post by Alyssa Rosenberg about Harry Potter, Katniss Everdeen & Movement Mascots, because it's pretty interesting, & the second is to a piece by Sady Doyle that the first link refers to: In Praise of Joanne Rowling's Hermione Granger Series
(ETA: Also, because I'm a few days late with this, here's the link to Sady Doyle's response to the feedback on her first post, where she makes a lot of good points. )
I have two problems with the the "In Praise of the Hermione Granger Series" post. The first problem is the issue that it takes with Joanne Rowling using her initials as her pen name. When JK Rowling approached publishers with Harry Potter & the Philosopher’s Stone she was an unemployed single mother with a very young child who wanted to sell her novel. I think it's unfortunate that we live in a society where young boys are taught - usually completely unconsciously - to avoid reading books by female authors, even those with male protagonists, for fear of them being too girly. I think it's unfortunate that we live in a society where "girly" means "unsuitable for boys." However, I really don't think anyone can blame an unpublished writer for trying to attract a wider readership.
My second problem with the piece is this: it is entirely possible for a male character to represent gender equality. In a perfect society girls & boys would be represented equally in children's books and on television, but unfortunately we don't live in that society, & in order to raise these issues with children of all genders it seems to often be necessary to speak through a male character's mouth. The Harry Potter series is hardly a beacon of anti-feminism, but my thoughts on gender roles in the series are multiple & variant (& often contradictory) & could take up an entire thesis let alone a blog post, so I'll let them be for now.
I think that there might be a difference between feminist texts & texts with Strong Female Characters. Not all feminist texts have strong female characters & not all strong female characters live in feminist texts. Hermione Granger is a Strong Female Character. However, if she were the protagonist of Hermione Granger & the Philosopher's Stone the book, unfortunately, would never have been published. Harry Potter's opinion & treatment of women, however, is not unlike Hermione's. He accepts that women can be as intelligent & adventurous as men (he respects Professor McGonagall as much as he does Professor Dumbledore & trusts & relies on Hermione as much as he does Ron) & also that they can be as powerful & evil (he hesitates no more in fighting Bellatrix than he does Voldemort). Gender roles in the series aside, that's a pretty big feminist step.
So while, yes, we should certainly be angry & disappointed that the popular culture we've grown up with over-sexualises, underestimates & under-represents women & girls, & we should what we can to raise awareness about these inequalities in order to change them, let's also celebrate the small victories, the Strong Female Characters, the Hermione Grangers, Lyra Belacquas & Katniss Everdeens of the world.
I'm writing a book at the moment (at the same time as a PhD thesis, because I'm just that much of a
And, in the same vein, who were your #childhoodfeministheroes? Who are your favourite Strong Female Characters?
Does Mary Poppins fall into the list of strong female characters?
ReplyDeleteI adored Katy Carr from the What Katy Did series. Also loved Little Women's Jo.
ReplyDeletePunky Brewster (though from the tv series) was a huge influence on my, I loved her. She was so cool and outspoken, and episodes drew attention to gender issues as well as other things like peer pressure and drugs.
I think I write as many male as female characters. I find male characters can be more fun to write sometimes. Whoever said "write what you know" was boooring.
@adoreabubbles: Sure thing! She was kind of a superhero.
ReplyDelete@A-kup: I completely agree! Except I've no idea who Punky Brewster is. *goes to Google*
I liked Laura Ingalls because she was a tomboy, and Lyra, and Matilda, and many others but I'm sleepy and haven't had breakfast so I can't remember them right now.
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like we all read exactly the same books as children. :-) Matilda is wonderful!
ReplyDeleteOh and Ramona!
ReplyDeleteAnd because I keep thinking about this -- Violet Baudelaire from A Series of Unfortunate Events. I only started reading them when I was 18, so too late for her to be a childhood hero, but she is an awesome character.
ReplyDeleteWhen I had run out of Hardy boys and Nancy Drew novels to read, my grandad gave me some Anne McCaffrey books. Her novels Dragonsong and Dragonsinger had a huge impact on me. They feature a young female protagonist.
ReplyDeleteI have never really thought about whether I prefer male or female protagonists, but I think I'm fairly well balanced. Perhaps I am lucky to enjoy reading the science fiction and fantsy, a genre where female protagonist, though outnumbered, are not uncommon.
I'm thinking of 'Crystal singer' and 'The ship who sang' by Anne McCaffrey, the entire Serranno series by Elizabeth Moon and I have just finished 'Daughter of the empire' by Jenny Wurts and Raymond Feist.